The Freedom to Suffer

a-crying-child[1]

 I was exchanging messages on Facebook the other day with a former Sheridan College student who now lives in Michigan with her husband and two children, ages 4 and 2.  She and her husband both work at minimum wage jobs. They pay their bills. They are paying off student loans. Their older son needs extensive dental work. He was getting treated until the government shut down because he qualified for Medicaid in Michigan. His Medicaid was disrupted by the shut-down. It will take 30 days for him to reinstated on Medicaid.  Meanwhile his mouth hurts so much he cannot eat much of anything.  He is four years old. His pediatric dentist will not treat him unless my student and her husband come up with $400.00 to pay what Medicaid would have paid.  Ultimately, they might be reimbursed, but they do not have that kind of cash on hand. I am appalled by this situation.

 We are the only country in the developed world without some system of universal health care.  A week ago, zealots in our government attached strings to what would have been an unremarkable debt ceiling resolution that they hoped would over –turn the Affordable Care Act.  The irony is that I am sure that my former student’s child is not the only one who is suffering because of this short-sighted and dangerous action. The very Americans that Ted Cruz and his cronies said they were helping are, in fact, the ones who are suffering because of the shut-down.  Our current system is not perfect, and the Affordable Care Act is not perfect. No system is perfect, but a government that shuts down regardless of the harm it does to its youngest and most vulnerable citizens is beyond irresponsible. It is immoral.

If I could I would send this young woman the money, and I may yet, but that is a small solution to a much larger problem; that is, the partisanship in Washington that does not allow for true governance.  When I think about the good that Social Security has done, the good that Medicare has done,  it makes no sense not to consider the health and welfare of our youngest citizens.  Universal health care is  not a “government overreach,” but it is a necessity. The cry that the Affordable Care Act infringes on our “freedoms” rings completely false when we look at a suffering child. When did it become freedom to allow children to suffer for  lack of medical care, dental care or nutrition? What kind of freedom is that allows a four-year-old to unable to eat because his teeth hurt too much? What kind of country do we have when we spout abstractions about freedoms but cannot provide the care for our youngest?  “Freedom” in this context becomes a totally  self-serving word that rings hollow when we know that it was not the children of Congressmen and women who suffer.

I love many things about this country, but I do not understand why we can’t take care of our people.  I do not understand why we cannot learn from all the other developed nations in this world.  We do not need to have a system exactly like Britain’s or Canada’s, but we must find a better way to take care of our children.

Jane

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The Freedom to Suffer

  1. Thank you for sharing this very horrific story. I will share this blog posT with my Congresswoman. It is only by calling the perpetrators of these crimes against children to account (and I believe that is what this is) that we will see change.

  2. We can’t have national healthcare because D.C. is currently run by monied interests. If you don’t “play ball” you don’t get re-elected. Until we publicly fund elections, the national government will never do more than pretend to care about/work for the general populous. It’s not just a problem of money corrupting, but the corrupted work to keep the honest people out.

  3. It seems to me that the public at large will (and should) eventually pay to help this little boy – but because of backwards ideas about “personal responsibility” we will only pay once he is very, very sick and ends up in the emergency room. It also seems obvious that less expensive, preventative care is always the best option.

Comments are closed.